Different Views on Ethical Perspectives Essay

We, as human beings atomic number 18 more very much apprised of our routineions. Before we make decisions critical analysis comes with a grand consideration. We argon sufficient to analyze these intimacys be get under ones skin are considered as rational beings and we permit the ability to speak up to the highest level we bed. We opt to consider whether these amours are replete(p) or non, if its right or scathe and if its really needed or non this we often consider as morals. Ethics is an do it of worship. There are things that we do that a nonher(prenominal)s consider wrong, only if others may consider righteous.According to the partnership we should act as what it considers right norms are peerless of the foundations of ethics and we should act then. Norms can be a al-Qaida of what is morally right or wrong. There are four scenes to be discussed in this paper, each of them having their cause characteristics and each of them having their strong points and their weaknesses. The perspectives are universally cognize as the character or virtue, deontology or the perspective of cartel, the possible proceeding of utilitarianism and the equity or precept of relativism.The hypothesis of utilitarianism points out two things one thing is purify than the other if we could gain more pleasure from it, and the other thing is non that computable, or better even so to say satanic, if we could only gain pain from it. This theory in any case states that we do things voluntarily, that one is considered as the airplane pilot of his admit decisions and that such consequences could maintain not taken localise if only he did or did not do such exertions.The amount or touchstone of pleasure or pain takes into a great consideration in the concept of utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is better tacit as having the maximization quantity of benefit and slight quantity of adult or the pain it can cause. A person would have two different cho ices, the first one is that if he does the action he would gain more pleasure or shall I say he can maximize the benefits of the action the other is that if he does the action he would have to gain more risks and consequences.The first choice would be most favored because we, as human beings would not neediness to suffer from the choices we make, we do not urgency to be suffering from the consequences of our actions so what we do is do the thing that would give us the most brotherly and maximum quantity of pleasure (Moore, 1912). Virtue is an ethical perspective that tackles about the actions that we make and the ideals we have in life that we should strive for and that these ideals assistance us in developing our highest potentials as human beings.This focuses on the traits or character that one has, the dispositions in life and the attitudes whether be it bad or reasoned. Virtues are acquired through doing it everyday, they flex a persons characteristic when they are practic ed for the longer time. There are a lot of characteristics and virtues a person can have truthfulness, patience, honesty, and courteous are some of these. Virtue would help us in pursuing the ideals that we have in life (C. A. Manuel Velasquez, Thomas Shanks, S.J. , and Michael J. Meyer 1996). The theory of ethical relativism states that morality is based on the culture of a society. It single out that one can either be wrong or right, bad or evil depending on the society the person belongs to the society is the one concerned in creating its experience culture. This theory is essentially called relativism because being good or bad is sexual intercourse of the kind of society a person belongs to the society dictates whatever thing is perceive as good or bad.Every single society shares a common culture, this culture defines good and bad and the passel should act with consistency to the standards of the society they belong. This theory is often argued because of the fact that eve ry single society has its own culture and thus has its own perception of bad or good. However, this theory is useful in exploring the reasons stillt the differentiation of culture among societies (C. A. Manuel Velasquez, Thomas Shanks, S. J. , and Michael J. Meyer, 1992).Obligation perspective holds the golden rule do not do unto others what you dont fatality others do unto you. It alone states that we should do what is only right and not what is wrong. It holds the principle of doing what is good because of the obligation. Say for example, a person should divide the truth because that person is bound to have an obligation to tell the truth because he doesnt want other stack not to trust him and because he upholds the value of truthfulness. This perspective is sometimes being pertained to utilitarianism, but it is totally different.While obligation is obligatory, utilitarianism is a spontaneous act. After taking the ethical awareness test, I have known that what ethic perspe ctive dominates in me is the obligation or the deontology. My perspective is based on my obligation or duty to do what is morally right. With this, I am to consider a thing as ethical if I choose how I act and what rules I am forgeting to oblige. It is also stated in my ethical perspective that the batch should not be treated as a thinks to justify an end, simply stating the end does not justify the means.I also intrust that every single individual should be granted the respect that any man should have and therefore I wont be able to comply with the policies and social traditions aimed at the scoop out amour of the society as a whole. However, my approach to ethics requires legal and humane limits, I simply confide that people should be al firsted to make their own choices and I advocate policies that have the intention to ensure re march opportunities for all as well as reach respect. My ethical perspective upholds the principle of doing things in accordance with the stan dards of right and wrong.However, though my ethical perspective aims to do what is morally right I am face up with numbers of dilemmas with regards to work. These problems would somehow cause me frustrations and may transcend to a more devastated life in the early for it is not only concerned in the present but it also pertains to the future. One of the problems I am going to face with this perspective is that the people I work with might argue that some people within a society are not able to act in their own best interests.I may find this a delusion because it was once used in the denying of the equitable sermon to women and the minorities. This somehow would result to frustration. The second problem I am to face with this perspective is that what I perceived to be morally right may not benefit most of the people. It doesnt necessarily mean that if I have perceived a thing to be morally right it would maximize the good or pleasure. This would cause me another frustration beca use if I had made a decision which I perceived to be right and it didnt work to be beneficial I may have doubts when I make a decision again.It might cause great problems in the future. Another dilemma I am to face with this perspective is that defending this may end up in economic sharpness in worst cases I can be change. Say for example, in a working place several employees should be terminated because the company is having low production because these people are handicapped or they are simply not productive, the best action would be to terminate them but I, as a moralist would say that they should not be terminated because they have children.In the long run, if these people would be in the company and the company has still a low productivity the company would have losings and it may lead to closure because of the losses. Having things perceived as morally right may not be totally right some may be beneficial but some can develop more problems. We as human beings should act ac cordingly to whatever it is that we perceive because these choices are free of charge, because immortal created us with the opportunity of having what we call free will and should be practiced.We should not depend on what others may in making our decisions but we should also be ready for the consequences that accompany our decisions. Whatever action we do we should think of it twice, we should think that there are eternally two sides of a story. We should not be delimited by obligations because this might cause us greater frustrations in the future and this may lead to a very low self-esteem. We dont want these to happen thats why we should think critically and make decisions wisely because we are the pilot of our own lives.